Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Synopsis and Concept.

Concept:
The main concept of our film is going to be about how young naive girls get in to trouble for doing illegal stuff or perform actions for which they are under age. It is kind of a cliché but we are willing to do it irrespective to out focus group. The genre of our film is going to be thriller and we are discussing whether to include romance or not. 


Synopsis:

Friday, 21 October 2011

Focus Group

Yesterday we did our focus group. We faced a few problems, the main problem was "resources", we had to perform it in school timing as our target audience for teen/drama/comedy film  is of our age so we got around 10 people in our media lab and showed them 4 trailers our main focus was on Billy Elliot and Whip it.


Our main question from our audience was "what kind of a subject of a movie do you prefer to watch ?" and their suggestions and views about the films they wanted to watch.


Below is the video with captions of our main question of our focus group. 

Thursday, 13 October 2011

Institutional Analysis

Since we have to decide a institution that shall distribute our film into the main media world i have done some research on  Summit Entertainment, Focus Features, Working Title Films and Screen Gems.

Summit Entertainment LLC (formerly Summit Entertainment LP) is an independent film studio headquartered in Santa Monica, California with international offices in London. 
Summit was originally founded in 1991 by film producers Bernd EichingerArnon Milchan, and Andrew G. Vajna, initially to handle film sales in foreign countries. Summit later expanded into producing and co-financing films in 1995, and started fully financing films by 1997.Summit officially launched in 1993 by Patrick Wachsberger, Bob Hayward and David Garrett under the name Summit Entertainment LP as a production, distribution, and sales organization. Among the company's early successes is American Pie, which Summit distributed outside of English-speaking territories.In 2006, it became a fully independent film studio, Summit Entertainment, with the addition of Rob Friedman, a former executive at Paramount Pictures. The new company added major development, production, acquisitions, marketing and distribution branches with a financing deal led by Merrill Lynch and other investors giving it access to over $1 billion in financing. 

Not to mention Summit Entertainment is the company that released the best seller novel's films The Twilight Saga. After releasing these films the company has gained more recognition amongst the teen population that is our target audience so Summit Entertainment could have been a good choice for us. But keeping films like American Pie and even Twilight in mind, these films are either PG 13 or above. The film that we want to make has a much more simpler story and we want to make it appropriate for all kinds of audience. Summit Entertainment has also only made more films that attracts the young population which is appropriate for our kind of film but I think we need a more recognised institution in order to sell our film worldwide. 


Focus Features (formerly USA FilmsUniversal Focus and Good Machine) is the art house films division of NBC Universal's Universal Pictures, and acts as both a producer and distributor for its own films and a distributor for foreign films.
Focus was formed from the 2002 divisional merger of USA Films, Universal Focus and Good Machine. USA Films was created by Barry Diller in 1999 by combining October Films, Rogue and Gramercy Pictures. Vivendi sold the studio, among other entertainment assets, to GE in 2004 to form NBC Universal. 

The reason we have rejected this institution is that it is an art house film division. The film that we are making is not an art film it is pure entertainment and if let Focus Feature distribute our film it will be presumed by the audience that it is an art film an then our audience of the film will be limited and we do not want that we want as many people as possible to come and watch or buy our film because we already do not have a very large age bracket of our audience. 

Working Title Films is a British film production company, based in London, UK. The company was founded by Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in 1983. It produces feature films and several television productions, including films starring comic actor Rowan Atkinson. Eric Fellner and Bevan are now the co-owners of the company.


Working Title Films was co-founded by producers Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in 1983. The company produced a variety of films for PolyGram's London-based production company PolyGram Filmed Entertainment. An Anglo-Dutch film studio, PolyGram Films became a major Hollywood competitor. In 1999, PolyGram was sold to Seagram and merged with MCA Music Entertainment, to form Universal Music Group. PolyGram Films was merged and sold to Universal Studios in 1999.
Although contractually allowed to produce any film with a budget of up to $25 million, on a practical basis, Bevan and Fellner consult with studio executive at Working Title's parent company NBC Universal. Working Title is located in London, and is known for having a limited number of employees. The company also has other offices located in Los Angeles, and Ireland.
According to IMDb

Production Company - filmography

  1. Johnny English Reborn (2011) ... Production Company
  2. Wild Child (2008) ... Production Company
  3. Definitely, Maybe (2008) ... Production Company (as a Working Title production)
  4. Below the Fold (2007) ... Production Company
  5. Elizabeth: The Golden Age (2007) ... Production Company (in association with)
  6. Atonement (2007) ... Production Company
  7. United 93 (2006) ... Production Company
  8. Nanny McPhee (2005) ... Production Company (as a Working Title production)
  9. Pride & Prejudice (2005) ... Production Company (as Working Title)
  10. The Interpreter (2005) ... Production Company
  11. Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason (2004) ... Production Company (as Working Title)
  12. The Answer (2004) ... Production Company
  13. Rory O'Shea Was Here (2004) ... Production Company
  14. Wimbledon (2004) ... Production Company
  15. Mickybo and Me (2004) ... Production Company (presents)
  16. Thunderbirds (2004) ... Production Company (presents)
  17. The Calcium Kid (2004) ... Production Company (presents)
  18. Shaun of the Dead (2004) ... Production Company (present)
  19. A Tale of Two Wives (2003) (TV) ... Production Company
  20. Love Actually (2003) ... Production Company (producer) (as Working Title)
  21. Johnny English (2003) ... Production Company
  22. Ned Kelly (2003) ... Production Company
  23. The Shape of Things (2003) ... Production Company
  24. Thirteen (2003) ... Production Company (in association with)
  25. My Little Eye (2002) ... Production Company
  26. The Guru (2002) ... Production Company
  27. About a Boy (2002) ... Production Company
  28. Ali G Indahouse (2002) ... Production Company
  29. 40 Days and 40 Nights (2002) ... Production Company
  30. Long Time Dead (2002) ... Production Company
  31. The Man Who Wasn't There (2001) ... Production Company
  32. Captain Corelli's Mandolin (2001) ... Production Company
  33. Bridget Jones's Diary (2001) ... Production Company
  34. The Man Who Cried (2000) ... Production Company
  35. Billy Elliot (2000) ... Production Company (presents)
  36. O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) ... Production Company (as Working Title)
  37.  
     

Distributor - filmography
  1. Chasing Planes: Witnesses to 9/11 (2006) (V) ... Distributor (2006) (UK) (DVD)
  2. Pride & Prejudice (2005) ... Distributor (2005) (USA) (theatrical) (as Working Title)
  3. The Purifiers (2004) ... Distributor (2004) (UK) (theatrical)
  4. Gettin' Square (2003) ... Distributor
Analysis:
Our initial product was similar to a couple of films distributed by Working Tile Films. Since our movie will be mainstream and we plan on targeting a mass audience, we thought that Working Title Films would be an appropriate institution for us as it has distributed films such as 'Billy Elliot', 'Thirteen' and 'Definitely maybe' which grossed 9.7 million in 2024 theaters of United States and Canada. We also think that Working Title Films has done more recognised films as compared to Summit Entertainment and Focus Feature. But as we progressed towards our pre-production and our media teacher also changed and after a long debate with her about our film we changed our genre and hence our institutional choice also changed. 


Screen Gems: 
Research (source: Wikipedia):
Screen Gems is an American movie production company and subsidiary company of Sony Pictures Entertainment's Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group that has served several different purposes for its parent companies over the decades since its incorporation.

The company is well established it is not only focused on films but had Animation Studio that distributed Theatrical short film series and One-Shot Theatrical short films. For an entire decade, Charles Mintz distributed his Krazy Kat, Scrappy, and Color Rhapsody animated film shorts through Columbia Pictures. When Mintz became indebted to Columbia in 1939, he ended up selling his studio to them. Under new management, the studio assumed a new name, Screen Gems. The name was derived from an early Columbia Pictures slogan, "Gems of the Screen", itself a takeoff on the song "Columbia, the Gem of the Ocean"

Screen Gems is also notable for being, in an attempt to keep costs low, the last American animation studio to stop producing black and white cartoons. The final black-and-white Screen Gems shorts appeared in 1946, over three years after the second-longest holdouts. During that same year, the studio shut its doors for good, though their animation output continued to be distributed until 1949.
The Screen Gems cartoons were only moderately successful when compared to those of Disney, Warner Bros., and MGM.
The company also distributed selected TV shows. In 1948, Screen Gems was revived to serve as the television subsidiary of Columbia, producing and syndicating several popular shows.
From 1958 through 1974Screen Gems delivered classic TV shows and sitcoms: Father Knows Best, Dennis the Menace, The Donna Reed Show, Hazel, Here Come the Brides, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Gidget, Bewitched, I Dream of Jeannie, The Flying Nun, The Monkees, and The Partridge Family. It was also the original distributor for Hanna-Barbera Productions, an animation studio founded by William Hanna and Joseph Barbera after leaving Columbia's now-semi-sister studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Feature Film Studio of Screen Gems:
On September 16, 2002, Columbia TriStar Television became Sony Pictures Television,[3] while three years earlier, in 1999, Screen Gems was resurrected as a fourth specialty film producing arm of Sony's Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group, after Sony Pictures Classics, Triumph Films and Destination Films. creen Gems produces and releases "films that fall between the wide-release movies traditionally developed and distributed by Columbia Pictures and those released by Sony Pictures Classics."

Many of its releases are of the horror, thriller, action, comedy and urban genres, making the unit similar to Dimension Films Hollywood Picturesand Rogue PicturesThe most-successful Screen Gems film commercially as of November 2010 was Resident Evil: Afterlife, which grossed $296,221,566 in international box office receipts.

According to IMDb

Production Company - filmography
  1. Think Like a Man (2012) ... Production Company (presents)
  2. The Vow (2012) ... Production Company
  3. Underworld: Awakening (2012) ... Production Company (presents)
  4. The Mortal Instruments (2012) ... Production Company
  5. Mardi Gras: Spring Break (2011) ... Production Company
  6. Straw Dogs (2011) ... Production Company (presents)
  7. Friends with Benefits (2011) ... Production Company (presents)
  8. Priest (2011) ... Production Company (presents)
  9. The Roommate (2011) ... Production Company (presents)
  10. Burlesque (2010/I) ... Production Company (presents)
  11. Country Strong (2010) ... Production Company (presents)
  12. Easy A (2010) ... Production Company (presents)
  13. Takers (2010) ... Production Company (presents)
  14. Death at a Funeral (2010) ... Production Company
  15. Dear John (2010/I) ... Production Company (presents)
  16. Armored (2009) ... Production Company (presents)
  17. The Stepfather (2009) ... Production Company (presents)
    ETC
     
  18. Distributor - filmography
  19. Resident Evil: Retribution (2012) ... Distributor (2012) (USA) (theatrical)
  20. Think Like a Man (2012) ... Distributor (2012) (USA) (theatrical)
  21. The Vow (2012) ... Distributor (2012) (USA) (theatrical)
  22. Underworld: Awakening (2012) ... Distributor (2012) (USA) (theatrical)
  23. Phenom (2012) ... Distributor (2012) (USA) (theatrical)
  24. Planet B-Boy (2012) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  25. The Mortal Instruments (2012) ... Distributor (2012) (USA) (theatrical)
  26. Breaking Waves (2011) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (TV), Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  27. Straw Dogs (2011) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  28. Friends with Benefits (2011) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  29. Priest (2011) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  30. Attack the Block (2011) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  31. The Roommate (2011) ... Distributor (2011) (USA) (theatrical)
  32. Burlesque (2010/I) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  33. Country Strong (2010) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  34. Easy A (2010) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  35. Resident Evil: Afterlife (2010) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  36. Takers (2010) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  37. Stomp the Yard 2: Homecoming (2010) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  38. Death at a Funeral (2010) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  39. Dear John (2010/I) ... Distributor (2010) (USA) (theatrical)
  40. The Stepfather (2009) ... Distributor (2009) (USA) (theatrical)
  41. Prom Night (2008/I) ... Distributor (2008) (USA) (theatrical)
    ETC


Analysis:
Since our new genre of the film is thriller/action Screen Gems sounded like an appropriate choice to be our institution. It has a large amount of potential audience hence there is a good possibility that people who are prone to watching thriller films from Screen Gems will be attracted to watch our film as well which will naturally make the target audience to our film larger than any chick-flick film would have. Another reason for choosing Screen Gems is that it is owned by one of the major media houses of Hollywood that is Columbia Pictures and the other one is Sony Pictures Entertainment which is also known worldwide. This decision makes the producers and directors of the film relived on the distributing part, they know that their film is going to be distributed by a reliable company which already has so many fans that even if the film is not liked by many the producers will take out the money they spent on the film.

Monday, 10 October 2011

The basic questions of audience research



Before we assumed who our audience is going to be, the three of us sat and made a check list with the characteristics of the people who are most likely to watch our film.


1. Who are the viewers we will be addressing?
Girls and Boys

2. What age group?
15 - 25

3. Are they male, female, or both?
Both

4. What educational background?
They all go to English medium schools, have information about sports, they must all see sports in their school.

5. What socioeconomic status?
Teenagers who come from Lower-middle class to upper-higher class.

6. What values, prejudices, assumptions do they have about life?
(To have a larger audience we decided that) They can be mentally healthy and happy people, depressed, courageous, ambitious, the film can be watched by people who like sports and play some kind of sport and the people who do not.

7. Where do our viewers stand on the issue we are showing about?
They can be positive, negative or have no idea about sports or the problems that girls face while playing a sport. The film is not that technical based.

8. Do they know anything about it?
They should know something at least. Most of the teenagers do know what squash is.

9. If so, how might they have learned about it?
Through media, school, someone in the family, social circle etc.

10. Is there anything we have in common with our viewers on the issue?
Our viewers are going to be of our age group, hence we understand what people of our age group go through in our society especially girls. We are enthusiastic about making a film on a girl who plays squash in a country like Pakistan, we think our viewers would be enthusiastic too since a game like Squash has never been brought up before in any film industry on large scale.

11. How do we want our viewers to view the issue?
We want them to view it positively as we want the film to encourage people towards squash positively.

12. If they are hostile to our view, can we persuade them to see the issue our way?
Yes we can, through an excellent direction and storyline.

While researching we came across a website which included many helpful guidelines to conduct an audience research. at the end of the web-page we found a couple of questions and we though we should answer them to evaluate ho much we know about our audience. Some questions we may have not answered.


1. How large is the audience - both as an average, and as the reach (number of different people)?

Since our move is main stream therefore we are targeting mass audience mainly including teenagers and adolescents for our movie


2. What kind of people make up the audience? How do they differ from the whole population - e.g. in terms of age group, sex, occupation, etc?


Our audience for the survey was made up of students between the age group of 15-30. There were more girls than boys. There were very few people in the age group of 20-30 who were teachers.


3. Where is your audience? In each part of your coverage area, what percentage of the population are members of your audience?


We have targeted teenagers in Pakistan and the survey we conducted was in our school where 80% of our target audience is found. Our potential watchers will be in such schools and homes in Pakistan


6. What type of content (e.g. radio and TV programs, newspaper articles) interests your audience most - and least?


The audience wanted something different and witty and they did not want to see any stereotypical theme of distress and problems like those shown in many teenage movie


7. What styles of presentation do your audience prefer, and what styles do they dislike?


Our audience preferred more attention grabbing graphics, music and different varienty of shots. They wanted a trailer that was more fast paced.


8. Which activities, attitudes, and other effects do your publications cause among your audience?


Our previous movie made in AS gave a positive response from the audience as it also represented a teenager. However it was thought to be more slow paced and dull.


9. How will your audience react to a new kind of program or article that you might introduce?


Our audience showed a positive response to the survey we conducted and also in the focus group, they liked the trailers of the similar genre as our movie shown to them.



Sunday, 9 October 2011

Survey 2 Results

Below are the responses we received from our second questionnaire particularly focusing on the choice of movies watched by our audience. 


The age group we asked questions from:















Female Respondents to our questionnaire:


   Male respondents to our questionnaire:









Rough Schedule

October: 5th Visit and decide on locations 

October 10th Finalized Treatment



October 12th Prepare a script


October 20th Shooting 1st day Marium’s House 3:00 to 6:00


October 22nd Shooting 2nd day Steel town 3:00 to 6:00


October 24th Shooting 3rd day School 11:00 to 2:00


October 26th Shooting 4th day Marium’s House 3:00 to 6:00


Obviously there are going to be amendments made in this schedule because we have to talk to out actors whether they are free on these dates or not and we also have to know whether our locations are available to only us or not. 


The locations have been decided I will post the pictures once I'm organised with all the pictures and the storyboard.

Sunday, 25 September 2011

Ancillary Analysis (Film Posters)

1. Outcast: The poster of this film conveys the message that this film is going to be action/horror/suspense. The animal hand/claw tells the viewer that the villain resembles a wild animal and is chasing two people in a city. The Animal hunts at night since the lighting in the poster is dark and the atmosphere is gloomy. The type of font that is used for the title of the film suggests that the film has religious content too. The cross signs instead of 'T' and the pentagram in the 'O' of outcast further more gives the impression that it is related to Christianity. The blood stains on the font tell that the film contains bloodshed.


2. Who Killed Nancy: The poster of this film is a little confusing, its hard to judge whether the person who was killed was innocent or guilty of something. A female was killed (may be a young woman) the portrait gives this idea. The pictures of the men indicate they were gangsters/drug dealers and the murder might have taken place at a hotel or may be something important in the film happened in a hotel. The poster leaves the viewer puzzled, inadequate information is given in the poster for the viewer to understand anything except for the basic theme of the film i.e. murder.


 3. Atonement: The pictures in the poster convey that the film is about two young adults (male and female), the phrases "Joined by love. Separated by fear. Redeemed by hope." tell that the film is a romantic tragedy, the clothes of the hero are of the army so the audience may think that he went to army and Keira Knightley kept on waiting for him and eventually they never reunited. 

 4. Blitz: The poster says that this film is an action/adventure film through the gun the man is holding, the expression on the face of this man. There is only one main character. The main story revolves around a cop killer and a killer cop. This is a typical Hollywood adventure/crime/action film where the good guy goes after the bad guy and one of them or both of them end up being dead, with a tragic and heroic ending.
5. Chico & Rita: By only looking at the poster of this film a few things that come in mind are:
  • The film is about black people.
  • It is an animated film.
  • Its a love story.
The market that is shown in one of the pictures in the poster demonstrate that the film is set in Africa or a third world country like Cuba. The woman on the poster is dancing and there is a phrase "love is a song you never forget" so may be the film has some musical element in it as well.

6. Gnomeo & Juliet: The name of the film directs the audience mind direct to one thing that is the film is romantic. This film is also animated as shown in the poster and the main character of the film is standing upside down which means the film is also a comedy film. It is about strange looking little human like creatures and the film's basic plot is about a garden.
7. In the Loop: According to the poster this film is a comedy feature. It is a political film (may be) because the ties the two men are wearing are the flags of USA and United Kingdom. They are connected through a telephone line and the messed up wire suggests that they can not communicate with each other clearly and there is a lot of confusion and the situation is very serious as the sentence says "The fate of the world is on the line". 




What I learned from analysing a few of these posters is that the genre of the film is easily identified by the poster, the important cast is known, the main theme and story line is guessed by the audience and the publicity of the film is also done through posters in the cinemas etc. The catchy sentences that are written on the posters make the viewer want to watch the film, in the poster above almost every poster has its own line that speaks for the movie. 
The posters that I have chosen above are from British films and I have not seen most of them, I chose these posters so that I could analyse them without my personal opinions about the films, I wanted to analyse them from the eye of an audience so that I could understand the clear meaning of the poster and by analysing them I think posters' main aim is to make its audience curious and confused about the movie. Every human being wants answers to clear their head from any confusion.

Saturday, 24 September 2011

Survey 2

Keeping Pakistani society and the results of the research on internet in mind we made another questionnaire and gave it to people to fill we tried to keep the questions as simple as possible.
Here are a few example survey pages that we distributed:



The results were:





Problems faced by young people today.

My group members and I have decided that we are going to work on a film who's target audience is of our age group i..e 15 - 25 years old people. I did some research over the internet about the problems that are faced by the young people these days with the thought that it might help us construct the story of our film and according to a blog 41 problems with young people are: